Science-Fiction and Fantasy Books by Jack VanceA Few Words About Jack Vance(My apologies for the length of this page: Jack Vance is impossible to describe briefly; more to the point, he wants many illustrative quotations, and even then we glance off the exact stroke of the essence--an observation that is an "in" jest.)When one looks at Vance's oeuvre, the numbers alone become daunting. Vance has been writing books for over half a century and, just in our fields, already has out - he is the only of my five-star authors still producing - well over two score novels and about a dozen and a half (depending on how one counts) collections of short stories. With such an output, not every single work is going to be a masterpiece, but an amazing many are, and most of the rest are very good; I reckon there are not over two or at most three clunkers (virtually all very early work) in the lot. (Besides all the books in our fields, Vance has also written over a dozen mystery/crime novels, one of which won an Edgar - the mystery-fiction equivalent of the Hugo - and several of which were printed under the "Ellery Queen" byline.) Vance's huge output in our fields can reasonably be divided into four categories, though of unequal sizes. The first division is between science-fiction and fantasy; his output in each of those arenas can then be further divided into comedic tales and heroic tales. The preponderant class is heroic science fiction, but his fantasy tales and his comedic tales (there is much overlap there) contain some of his best-known work. Despite all that variety, there is not much chance of mistaking a book by Jack Vance for anyone else's work (or vice-versa). There are two overarching characteristics that mark a Vance tale: mordant dialogue of a flavor nearly unique (only Ernest Bramah in his Kai Lung tales is, to my knowledge, comparable) and extraordinarily rich, vivid, awesomely complete portrayals of wildly bizarre-seeming yet (on reflection) utterly plausible human societies or worlds or people. Those are not his only excellences, but they are the ones that immediately hallmark his work. Let me try to assess those excellences methodically. As I have said repeatedly on this site, in my eyes the four chief ways in which books may please us are language use, plot, setting, and characterization, so I will speak of each in turn. In three of those four ways, Vance is superb - richly, inimitably so; only of plotting can we say that it is not a great strength with him. Grasp, if you will, that that is very different from saying that his plots are weak or defective, for they are not - it is simply that his plots are not one of the great attractions that make us seek out his works. On the whole (though not invariably) his plots are linear and episodic: the point of view is solely that of the protagonist, and the action proceeds steadily through a sequence of relatively distinct episodes. Moreover, there is frequently heavy reliance on coincidence--as if the idea is to get on with the main business of the day, and never you mind how we get there. Vance is neither unaware of plotting mechanics - The episode had run its course. Emotions, hopes, gallant resolves: all past and gone like sparks on the wind.- nor is he unable to manage complexities when he chooses, for in a few instances (such as the "Lyonesse" series) his plots are complex yet competent. My own belief is that Vance can best be conceived as a tailor of prose, to whom plots are the tailor's dummies on which to array the wonderfully cut and remarkably colored garments that are his real business. The dummies must be sturdy and shaped well enough to properly hold and show off those garments, but fashioning such dummies is not what his craft is all about. In the other three areas of pleasing, Vance is triumphant. His language use is literally wonderful: he coins exotic words so true to roots that one needs to search an unabridged dictionary to discover which of his unfamiliar terms are real (his vocabulary is monumental) and which of his coining. Nuncupatory, twittler, venefice, tintamar - those are in dictionaries you can pick up and read; sanivacity, malditties - those are pure Vance (hurlothrumbo, though not to be found in my copy of the OED, turns out also to be a real word, or name anyway). But it is in the arch, bone-dry, ironic mode of dialogue Vance assigns his characters that his wit, and his genius with language, is perhaps most manifest. The speeches Vance puts in his characters' mouths are often not at all plausible, but therein lies their very charm: a dull, stupid, ignorant, old man in a cheap bar remarking that "In this life events bend to no such kindly patterns" (and there you see the resemblance to Bramah and the Kai Lung tales). At this point with another writer I might simply say "and here are some examples that show you what I mean." I will with Vance too, but we need first this cautionary note: isolated quotations, even lengthy ones, will not do the job properly. Vance's dialogues do not succeed, do not achieve their peculiar pungency, their deliciously mordant quality, on the basis of telling punch lines: they succeed by effortlessly sustaining their gentle but firm ironic tone (Vance is never crude or overbearing with his irony) throughout each tale. The effect on the reader is cumulative. Any extract must therefore fail to convey their quality just as one cannot convey the pleasures of a long soak in a hot tub by pouring a thimbleful of warm water over someone's fingers. With that caveat we can but try: "In short, you fear that the money will be stolen from you?"Sufficient reading in Vance will show that his characters rarely say anything not dryly ironic. But they do not all express themselves alike: there are two distinct modes: sometimes they express their ironies plainly enough, and sometimes they speak that curiously stilted rodomontade visible in the quotations above. To the attentive reader, Vance's choice of mode is a telling clue to the nature of the character speaking. Vance's works are none of them (save the ill-starred Gray Prince) polemic or didactic. It is not that Vance does not have clear, strongly held views, nor is it that those views are not expressed in his works. The crux is how those views are expressed: his works are - as they should be - tales and, taking the gross liberty of quoting myself: Most of the tales that succeed in duly stimulating us were written by authors who were "merely" telling a story. Without any explicit intent to model this or that truth, such masterly tale tellers model many truths by simply displaying life as they understand it.And that is what Jack Vance does: he shows us the world as he understands it in his tales without telling us "this is how the world is." In the world as Vance understands it, there are evidently two broad but relatively definite and distinct categories of persons: a minority of decent, commonsensical, honest, hard-working, kindly, down-to-earth, competent, capable folk, and everybody else, with that everybody else having few or none of the virtues of the minority and being everything they are not - thoroughly selfish, flighty, dishonest, lazy, rude, superficial, incompetent, scatter-brained or downright stupid. Vance allows himself the luxury of amusing himself, and us, by having folk of the first class, the white hats one might say, speak in unexceptionable English. Those of the second class (which includes Vance's picaresque protagonists) invariably speak that curious, stilted patois. Not all of the second class are perforce "black hats" - actual villains - but they are a gormless lot. (It is one of Vance's most astounding accomplishments that he can work highly comedic forms of irony into serious, indeed grim, heroic tales without missing a beat--though, as we will see, Vance breaks lots of "rules" of writing to wonderful effect; of the quotations above, several come from "serious" tales and it is by no means obvious a priori which are which.) Vance's excellences in language use encompass more than just those wonderful dialogues. His descriptions also can be marvelous. In his very first book, The Dying Earth (1950) - a collection of loosely related short stories set on an Earth so far in the future that the Sun is on the verge of going out and magic is, and for ages has been, again operative (a theme now commonplace, almost banal, so many others having since copied Vance's idea) - the descriptive writing is especially opulent, so much so that many people wrongly associate Vance with the sort of "mauve decadence" such opulence suggests: Such was Mazirian's garden--three terraces growing with strange and wonderful vegetations. Certain plants swam with changing iridescences; others held up blooms pulsing like sea-anemones, purple, green, lilac, pink, yellow. Here grew trees like feather parasols, trees with transparent trunks threaded with red and yellow veins, trees with foliage like metal foil, each leaf a different metal--copper, silver, blue tantalum, bronze, green iridium. Here blooms like bubbles tugged gently upward from glazed green leaves, there a shrub bore a thousand pipe-shaped blossoms, each whistling softly to make music of the ancient Earth, of the ruby-red sunlight, water seeping through black soil, the languid winds.There's more, but that suffices. It's excess, but it very certainly is not wretched excess; in time, while he kept the thoroughness, he toned down the opulence a little. Moreover, that passage shows the fine eye for rich, complete description that characterizes Vance, which brings us to his excellences in handling setting. Vance's eye for detail, for the little things that make a place seem absolutely real, cannot be exaggerated. Moreover, "eye" is an inadequate term: his descriptions always read like an account from one who has actually been to the place, seen its sights, smelled its perfumes, heard its musics, eaten its foods. Vance's mastery is not only in imagining such worlds, it consists in telling us no more and no less than we would be told of an exotic but real place in a mainstream novel whose protagonist is but passing through that place; Vance does superlatively what I set out elsewhere on this site as essential for an SF&F author: "fully imagine the world of the tale, then simply tell that tale in that world." (Food, tastes, seem especially to fascinate Vance; his heroes are never gourmets, but get their share and more of meals: elaborate and simple, appetizing and not - say we who eat snails and livers and brains. [Actually - as Louis B. Mayer supposedly once said - "include me out." This household is vegetarian.]) The time was middle morning; rain had darkened the black cobblestone pavement. Six-wheel drays lumbered along the streets; the entire district sounded to a subdued hum of engines. As Gersen walked a short sharp bleat of whistle signalled a change of shift; the sidewalks at once became crowded with workers. They were pale people, blank and humorless of face, wearing warm well-made coveralls in one of three colors: gray, dark blue, or mustard yellow; a contrasting belt, either black or white; black round-topped kaftans. All were standard issue, the government being an elaborate syndicalism, as thoroughgoing, careful, and humorless as its constituency.Delicious! How many of today's deadly serious authors could resist the temptation to tell us, at painful length, far more than even a professional musician might care to know about the darabence and its blare valves and whines - not to mention the place of roof demons in the local folklore. (Incidentally, Vance does not skimp detail through musical ignorance: he is a great long-time fan of Dixieland-style jazz, and could often be found down at Turk Murphy's joint in San Francisco [note to furriners: don't ever call it Frisco]; he often finds room, as in Space Opera, to mock the musically afflicted who don't appreciate a good, noisy jazz band with a banjo in it.) Vance's many worlds always seem at first blush to be wild, eccentric, bizarre - impossible. The thoughtless reader might disdain them as ridiculous fancies. But consider: Vance's tales are almost all set in universes in which the human race has flung itself outward, splintering thereby into large numbers of more or less independent societies - much as has happened several times in our past. And if we look back at the varieties of societies to be found in such eras in real history books, we quickly see that Vance's are not after all so strange. (Most of Vance's heroic s.f. tales seem to be set in the same historical universe, though he does not press the point on us as many other authors would. A few names or terms crop up in passing as signals to the cognoscenti: the IPCC [Interworld Police Coordinating Company], Navarth the mad poet, the Historical Institute of Old Earth, and so on. Those things are often immaterial to the tales, but do sort of glue them together, though they obviously span differing eras. In that universe, mankind discovered in the late twentieth century--how time catches us up!--far more by accident and luck than anything else, a simple, small, cheap interstellar drive, and has in consequence exploded out into the near galaxy, every smallest group--from religious whackos to vegetarians--setting up its own society on its own world on its own terms--not unlike the colonies in the New World in the 1500s and 1600s, save with even less oversight from a home government. Meanwhile, Old Earth rolls quietly on, largely ignoring the Outer Worlds with a quiet arrogance the rest of humanity finds little less galling than the very term "Outer Worlds." But plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose, and mankind remains incorrigibly mankind, with its vanities, follies, and grotesqueries only exaggerated by the sea changes of emigration to the stars.) I have spoken of, and tried--in vain I know (for, as I said, only long, continuous reading brings out the subtleties)--to illustrate Vance's ability to create fully sensed, in-depth, complex, real-seeming worlds. If you don't already know Vance, you may be thinking along the lines of "Now that's well and fine, but most good authors can construct complex worlds in some degree of detail; why is this guy harping so on Vance?" I will put aside the deeper depth and richer richness and more elegant elegance Vance achieves compared to most worldmakers to focus on what makes him extraordinary - no, more than extraordinary, unique. That special something is--we should have drum rolls here - Vance's ability to conjure up whole and complete worlds and societies so quickly, so easily, that he can use them as throwaways. Every SF&F author is bound to imagine a world different from our own in some way or ways, and to convey to us with a scope commensurate with the scale of the difference the nature and flavor of that world. Good SF&F authors imagine complex worlds for their tales; what Jack Vance does is imagine thoroughly complex worlds so easily, so capably, that he can use them as toys irrelevant to his tales; he does it just for fun; and he throws one after another of these full-scale worlds away in a few pages or, sometimes, a mere few paragraphs. They are like doodles in the margin, yet each is something that most other writers, even good ones, would have had to labor long and hard over as a prime project. Just look here: From Life, Volume I, by Unspiek, Baron Bodissey:If such things are "throwaways," where does Vance put them? I said earlier that Vance breaks lots of "rules" of writing; this is one: he puts a lot of his throwaways in as detached material at the heads of chapters. Now many authors start chapters with quotations from works real or imagined; but virtually all of those follow two rules - they are apposite to the chapter to follow, and they are brief. Vance sometimes follows those rules, but as often as not breaks one, the other, or both, to glorious effect. Some of his chapter-heading material runs for pages on its own; indeed, in some Vance series the recurring "quotations" become a virtual running mini-tale of their own: not, of course, complete, as a true tale would be, and necessarily possessed of often-huge gaps, but still a tale. As one example, just the many zany episodes - eventually concluded most satisfactorily - of the adventures of Marmaduke, as reported in chapter-heading "quotations" from Scroll From the Ninth Dimension, would be well worth publishing as a chapbook. And then there is the poetry of mad Navarth, and the copious and compendious philosophical observations of Baron Bodissey in his monumental, many-volume work Life: all joys, bonus joys above and beyond the delightful works they adorn. Not all the "throwaway" worlds are in chapter headings. Some are embodied right in the text of a tale, like this: Smade was a reticent man. His origins and early life were known only to himself. In the year 1479 he acquired a cargo of fine timber, which, for a whole set of obscure reasons, he took to a small stony world in the middle Beyond. And there, with the help of ten indentured artisans and as many slaves, he built Smade's Tavern.And that is about all we ever hear of Smade's Tavern save for a chapterful of things that happen there but that could just as well have happened in any nondescript--consider that word!--tavern anywhere. But Vance can work his magic in even fewer sentences: Not far off his line of fission was the star Cygnus T342, and its planet Euville where an unpleasant and psychotic population lived in five cities: Oni, Me, Che, Dun, and Ve, each compulsively built in pentagonal patterns, from the central five-sided citadel. The spaceport, on a remote island, was opprobriously named "Orifice." Everything Gersen needed could be found at the spaceport; he had no desire to visit the cities, especially since each required, in lieu of passport, the tattooing of a star on the forehead, a different color for each city. To visit all five cities, the prospective tourist must display five stars: orange, black, mauve, yellow, and green.Period: end of sentence, end of paragraph, end of chapter, end of Euville. An entire world, defined well enough that we can supply from our own minds, pointed by the description, enough more to make a place we can visualize well - all that in scarcely over a hundred words, several of which are germane to the tale proper and not the imagined world. And Vance can and does do that sort of thing over and over, all the time. We learn also from that quotation that we need always to keep our linguistic antennae fully extended when a wordsmith of Vance's caliber is at work; think about the name of that awful place: Euville. Vance not only coins likely sounding terms, he uses a vocabulary large enough that precious few readers will be able to get through an entire novel without a dictionary (preferably an unabridged). On the whole, no one word is so very exotic, but in sum it amounts to a test. (A favorite amusement of Vance's is to have a scalawag being questioned with uncomfortable closeness remark disdainfully and thus dismissively of some query "The question is nuncupatory.") Here, in keeping with this page's theme of extensive sample quotations, are a few more examples of Vance's utter mastery of setting, his throwaway imaginings: From "Smell Your Best," by Raul Thumm, article in Cosmopolis, January 1521:That, I submit, is clutch-your-vest-double-over-fall-to-the-ground-laughing humor (your opinions are your own). And I could go on all day--or at dozens of books' length, for virtually every scrap of Vance is quotable. (By the bye: in the passage above, test yourself: how many Vance coinings are there?) Another place Vance puts his throwaways is remarkable, and is another "rule" broken to wondrous effect. It is a thing that ought not to work, and in other hands likely would not work: footnotes. You don't put footnotes in novels! But Vance does and, because they are not really parts of the tale but only further opportunities for playful ironies, they work. Oh, do they work: Gersen entered a hall with a floor of immaculate white glass tiles. On one hand was the display wall, characteristic of middle-class European homes; here hung a panel intricately inlaid with wood, bone and shell: Lenka workmanship from Nowhere, one of the Concourse planets; a set of perfume points from Pamfile; a rectangle of polished and perforated obsidian; and one of the so-called "supplication slabs"* from Lupus 23II.Such a description excites, in the reader with sensibilities, many emotions, none calming. And such a one cannot dismiss it as a fictive frivolity, because it is a marvelous cameo archetype of the sort of tiny but monstrous horror actually being perpetrated every hour of every day somewhere, somehow, in the real world. That brings us round to a point that needs emphasizing: because Vance's tales, even his heroic ones, are brimful with humor, we must take especial care never to lose sight of his base seriousness. The comic tales themselves have comments to make on the human condition, but the serious tales are not just alternating irony and action: they have depth, fullness. What is an evil man? The man is evil who coerces obedience to his private ends, destroys beauty, produces pain, extinguishes life.In a reasonably long life that has included a not-negligible wading in the rivers of philosophical literature, I cannot recall a more succinct satisfactory working definition. Vance has seen much of the world, both literally and figuratively. Thus, in his tales, we find much of the world, also both literally and figuratively. Ethics is not the only branch of philosophy delineated; esthetics gets its due as well: "I am an unhappy man. I am haunted by my inability to express the inexpressible, to come to terms with the unknown. The pursuit of beauty is, of course, a major psychological drive. In its various guises--which is to say, the urge to perfection, the yearning to merge with the eternal, the explorer's restlessness, the realization of an Absolute created by ourselves, yet larger than our totality--it is perhaps the single most important human thrust.On the whole, Navarth is a ludicrously comic figure: Navarth attempted to lay his finger slyly alongside his nose, but miscalculating, prodded his eye.Pure Three Stooges. Yet - as the prior quotation shows - cut him and he bleeds. At his core, beneath his follies, in his own realm, Navarth is another person: he is a great poet. And in such three-dimensional characterization lies another facet of Vance's genius. Vance's characters are in many ways like his settings: bizarrely varied, but not impossibly so: they are but the logical products of their bizarrely varied societies. Again Vance fulfills superlatively my criteria for excellence, in this case: [F]or master tale-tellers there are no "minor characters" or human plot devices. Every being who steps on the stage of such a master writer's story has a past and a personality; she or he exists in the author's mind and can thus exist in ours.Navarth is perhaps not a "minor" character. But consider these snippets - all folk we see for perhaps, at most, one or two paragraphs each: The director of the lyceum was Dr. Willem Ledinger, a bland large-bodied man with taffy-colored skin and a lock of yellow hair which wound around his scalp in a most peculiar manner. Gersen wondered at the man's audacity thus to present himself before several thousand adolescents.Such are the secondary characters, who - in Vance - are in essence part of the settings themselves. Vance's primary characters, his heroes and villains and picaresque protagonists, are something else again. In Vance's picaresque tales, the villain, to the extent that there is one, is not integral to the tale: the real villain is the protagonist himself, who is usually not the winsome rogue the word "picaresque" sometimes evokes but rather a blowhard, a semi-competent or incompetent egotist with few or no morals; such protagonists - for his picaresque tales are all meant as savage humor - ultimately prevail (if they do indeed prevail) either by blind luck or by dint of their lying and cheating ways. To my own tastes, Vance's picaresque tales are his least successful (though still books by quality), owing to the protagonist's often failing the test I set out elsewhere on this site: "we can have no understandings with folk whose mental processes, intellectual or moral, are simply alien to us" - we cannot fathom them, we cannot empathize with them, we cannot enjoy them, save as we "enjoy" seeing someone slip on a banana peel. For myself, Vance's two "Cugel the Clever" novels are his least satisfactory mature work; but his novel Showboat World (the publisher's title - see the book list below) is much more enjoyable, perhaps because the protagonist, while another blowhard, at least has some scraps of wit and ethics and courage. It is, not surprisingly, Vance's heroes who speak most to us. For all their colorful variety, Vance's numerous heroic tales have many features in common. The prevalent motif is the hero indomitable. Vance's heroic protagonists again and again suffer reverses in fortune that would surely (the phrase is irresistible) daunt lesser men. These reverses are not "Conan the Barbarian" difficulties that require simple, sheer muscling out of: they are complicated situations. Vance clearly sees the hero as the man who will not give up in the face of difficulty, who perseveres no matter what. Frequently, but by no means always, they are men with special abilities: not innate abilities, but abilities acquired through long, diligent, difficult effort and iron-willed training--sometimes voluntary and sometimes forced on them by unpleasant circumstance. Equally commonly, Vance's heroes are social freaks: men swimming forcefully against the prevailing currents of their time and place. A regular plot pattern is the oncoming debacle or extant gross iniquity properly appreciated only by the hero (and perhaps a few stalwart allies), who is mocked by his community if he calls its attention to the problem--a problem that is invariably deflected or dispelled by his intrepidity (and careful forethought, planning, timely precautions, and huge exertions). It is largely a matter of personal taste as to which class of Vance's heroes are most esthetically successful: the ordinary fellows who, under the press of circumstances, do extraordinary things, or the extraordinary-to-begin-with fellows. One would think the former, save that Vance is mature enough to make plain to the reader the prices the extraordinarily talented ones have paid for those talents (a theme weak in the "Planet of Adventure" series, which somewhat diminishes it, and strong in the "Demon Princes" series). The villains in Vance's earlier works are, like the plots, devices needed as props on which to hang the garments of the telling. In his later works, there is a definite maturing: in the five-volume "Demon Princes" cycle, the hero takes one book per Demon Prince to wreak his revenge on the five greatest criminals of his era ("revenge" because their piratical raiding killed or enslaved all of the hero's family while he was a child). The five are portrayed as consummate monsters, but of profoundly different types, some even superficially appealing to the public (rather as the dapper Robin-Hood-style portrayal of Mephistopheles can be). The irony is that as the hero pursues their histories (for each is universally known by name and legend, yet is anonymous in personal detail so that he may freely walk the worlds in public), we come to see that each, for all his giant legend and very real power, is at bottom just a loser of one sort or another, a child pulling the wings off flies on a galactic scale. When once deprived of their anonymity, they are like evil counterparts of The Wizard of Oz behind his screen. Vance's irony plays richly with these villains, schoolyard bullies on steroids. In a sense, the quality of each of those five books - in my opinion among his very best - depends on the "quality" of the particular villain in it. Looking over all that I have presented here, I fear that I have, for all the length, still somehow managed to miss the essence of Vance. I suppose that is in part because, as I said earlier, his effect is cumulative; the quotations give you tidbits, but without reading an entire work or two you don't realize how high and consistent the quality is. Let's just put it this way: Jack Vance is one of the greatest writers in the English language. Go read his stuff - lots of it. Envoi: "Then let's visit the Jiraldra, where we can discuss Wellas and Nai the Hever and what lies beyond Zangwill Reef, and I'll describe the music of Eiselbar." "An idea of great merit! While we are alive we should sit among colored lights and taste good wines, and discuss our adventures in far places; when we are dead, the opportunity is past." Evaluating Jack Vance's BooksThe actual list of Vance books appears a little further below. For mechanical reasons, I find it convenient to keep that list identical with what is in the books-by-author pages of this site, so here I will collect the books under approximate rating headings.Vance has been writing wonderful tales for over half a century, so naturally the list is long. But, while they are, of course, not equally fine, there is scarcely a dud in the lot, even in his earliest work. In short: Vance started with a bang in 1950 with The Dying Earth, a top-notch work. He did a couple of commercial potboilers in the early 50s, then rang the bell again with To Live Forever in 1956. He next did a couple of weaker but credible books, books in which we already see the buds that will blossom more fully in his later heroic s.f. books. Over the next half decade he produced four very strong books, including the first two "Demon Princes" novels. After that he sort of idled, producing in the mid-60s five good but not great books, then the surprisingly weak Brains of Earth. But that was his last sub-par book: from the excellent third "Demon Princes" novel in 1967 he went on from triumph to triumph--almost 30 books of superb quality (saving, perhaps, 1974's The Gray Prince, a political polemic), not even counting his short-story collections--and is still going today. The sub-lists below are inexact and are one man's preferences: even Vance aficionados can have very different preferences within his body of work. (Be warned, for example, that my distaste for the Cugel books is not universal: many others would rate them higher.) Note that I have not attempted to rate the collections of his short stories; of his novels, are all rated but Vandals of the Void, a horrid old rarity commissioned and written explicitly as a "juvenile" (for a multi-author series) and implicitly for rent money - not a "real" Jack Vance book at all. Note: the titles in parentheses after some novels are the titles Vance intended for them, as opposed to those under which editors - many of whom were jackasses - published them. Vance's "Excellent" Books
Vance's "Very Good" Books
Vance's "Good" Books
Vance's "Fair" Books
Vance's "Weaker" Books
Where to BeginIt is, I reckon, most unwise to first essay an author with what may be the very cream of his work: wiser, I think, to start "mid-pack", knowing that greater treats then await, than to have no place left to go but down, however slightly down that may be.Thus--assuming all of Vance's works equally available--I would recommend the following as fair samplers of Vance's several voices:
My own favorite works are the five novels of the "Demon Princes" science-fiction cycle (all the quotations here with Kirth Gersen in them are from this cycle). Other Jack Vance ResourcesThrough noble and heroic efforts, the collected works of Jack Vance were published in a single uniform set of 44--yes!--volumes; sale was only as a unit of all volumes, with a limited number of sets. There do not seem to be any more sets available, either new from the VIE project or used, and the VIE web site is accordingly now simply a placeholder page; but there is now an ongoing "post-VIE" site from the VIE staff, the site appropriately named Foreverness.I am told that there may yet be a very few VIE sets available for purchase--you could check that by sending an email to the VIE staff.While you can and should explore that whole site, an important resource within it is the ongoing journal Cosmopolis, with articles and essays about Vance and his works. There is another good Vance web site--one of several such--at The Jack Vance Information Page; the particular page of that site I link here is a list of links to the many other sites concerned with Vance and his works. Yet another good-looking site is The Jack Vance Archive (multi-lingual!). To see how someone else came out of wrestling with how to explain Jack Vance and his works, visit Lord of Language, Emperor of Dreams: a profile of Jack Vance (a great title). Notable Science-Fiction and Fantasy Books by Jack Vance *****Vance has been writing literally wonderful tales for over half a century; naturally the list is long. But, while they are, of course, not equally fine, there is scarcely a dud in the lot, even in his earliest work. Note: the titles in parentheses after some novels are the titles Vance intended for them, as opposed to those under which editors--many of whom were jackasses--published them.
|