Toelichting bij Alfa's en bèta, sociologisch: Parkison's Law
|
.2011 |
Het boek Parkinson's Law van de econoom C. Northcote Parkinson,
stamt van 1958, dus van voor alle hypes over management en besturen. Het
hier voor ons relevante hoofdstuk heeft de titel The Short List, de
Engelse algemenere term voor die kleine groep kandidaten die in de laatste stap
van een procedure van selectie wordt toegelaten. Eerst wat inleidende stukken om
de sfeer te schetsen:
| |
A problem constantly before the modem administration whether in government or
business, is that of personnel selection. ...
Past methods, not entirely discussed, fall into two main categories, the British
and the Chinese. Both deserve careful consideration, if only for the reason that
they were obviously more successful than any method now considered fashionable.
The British method (old pattern) depended upon an interview in which the
candidate had to establish his identity. He would be confronted by elderly
gentlemen seated round a mahogany table who would presently ask him his name.
Let us suppose that the candidate replied 'John Seymour.' One of the gentlemen
would then say, 'Any relation of the Duke of Somerset?' To this the candidate
would say, quite possibly, 'No, sir.' Then another gentleman would say, 'Perhaps
you are related in that case, to the Bishop of Watminster?' If he said 'No, sir'
again, a third would ask in despair, 'To whom then are you related?' ... |
Enzovoort. Gelukkig kwam er de "Engelse
methode, nieuwe versie":
| |
The British method (new pattern) was evolved in the late nineteenth century as
something more suitable for a democratic country. The Selection Committee would
ask briskly, 'What school were you at?' and would be told Harrow, Haileybury, or
Rugby, as the case might be. 'What games do you play?' would be the next and
invariable question. A promising candidate would reply, 'I have played tennis
for England, cricket for Yorkshire, rugby for the Harlequins, and fives for
Winchester.' ... |
Enzovoort.
Ook deze methode is nog steeds een standaard in de hedendaagse praktijk. Maar
hier gaat het om deze variant:
| |
The Chinese method (old pattern) was at one time so
extensively copied by other nations that few people realize its Chinese origin.
This is the method of Competitive Written Examination. In China under the Ming
Dynasty the more promising students used to sit for the provincial examination,
held every third year. It lasted three sessions of three days each. During the
first session the candidate wrote three essays and composed a poem of eight
couplets. During the second session be wrote five essays on a classical theme.
During the third, he wrote five essays on the art of government. The successful
candidates (perhaps two percent) then sat for their final examination at the
imperial capital. ...
The effectiveness of this [Chinese] method was investigated
by a committee in 1854, with Macaulay as chairman. The result was that
the system of competitive examination was introduced into the Civil
Service in 1855. ... All these features were faithfully incorporated in the
Trevelyan-Northcote Report and thereafter in the system it did so much to
create.... It was assumed (no doubt rightly) that a scientific education
would fit a candidate for nothing - except, possibly, science. It was
known, finally, that it is virtually impossible to find an order of
merit among people who have been examined in different subjects. Since
it is impracticable to decide whether one man is better in geology than
another man in physics, it is at least convenient to be able to rule
them both out as useless. |
Tja ...
Het eindresultaat:
| |
When all candidates alike have to write Greek or Latin
verse, it is relatively easy to decide which verse is the best. |
Hetgeen de redactie doet denken aan het slot van Roman Polanski's The
Fearless Vampire Killers
(parafraserend) "Dat is de reden dat het kwaad zich over de hele wereld
verspreid heeft..."
Naar Meritocratie
 , Sociologie,
lijst
 , Sociologie, overzicht
, of site home
.
|
